Feature request #1167
SLD support in conjunction with WMS
|Assigned to:||-||% Done:||
|Target version:||Future Release - Nice to have|
|Platform version:||Pull Request or Patch supplied:||No|
It would be very helpful and very nice to have the option to define a SLD-URL in conjunction with WMS connection info.
Updated by frdcn - over 8 years ago
It would nice to have support for sld_body, this way styling for wms layers could be made directly in qgis using the style editor and eliminating the requirement to store the style file in a public visible ip address.
Updated by Tim Sutton over 7 years ago
Got this when trying to build your patch against .
sipcoreQgsRasterLayer.cpp: In function ‘PyObject* meth_QgsRasterLayer_setDataProvider(PyObject*, PyObject*)’:
sipcoreQgsRasterLayer.cpp:1794: error: no matching function for call to ‘QgsRasterLayer::setDataProvider(const QString&, const QStringList&, const QStringList&, const QString&, const QString&)’
/home/timlinux/dev/cpp/qgis/src/core/raster/qgsrasterlayer.h:374: note: candidates are: void QgsRasterLayer::setDataProvider(const QString&, const QStringList&, const QStringList&, const QString&, const QString&, const QString&, const QString&)
maker3: * [sipcoreQgsRasterLayer.o] Error 1
maker2: [python/core/core.so] Error 2
maker1: ** [python/CMakeFiles/python.dir/all] Error 2
Updated by Redmine Admin over 7 years ago
Sorry, I didn't build with python and didn't update the bindings, I will fix this and upload a new patch.
Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Version 1.7.0 to Version 1.7.4
Updated by Giovanni Manghi almost 5 years ago
- Target version changed from Version 1.7.4 to Version 2.0.0
Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 4 years ago
- Assigned to changed from Redmine Admin to Giuseppe Sucameli
- Pull Request or Patch supplied set to No
Updated by Giuseppe Sucameli over 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Open
- Assigned to deleted (
- Priority changed from Low to Normal
Support for sld_body is still missing.
There was a lot of changes to providers classes from the day the attached patches was written, it's unlikely that they can still be applied.
Also available in: Atom