Bug report #4408

Validating *.qgs or *.qml against *.dtd

Added by Marco Lechner almost 5 years ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:Open Start Date:10/19/2011
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assigned to:- % Done:

0%

Category:Project Loading / Saving
Target version:Future Release - Lower Priority
Platform: Pull Request or Patch supplied:No
Platform version: Affected version:master
Status info: Causes crash or corruption:No
Resolution: Tag:

Description

It's not possible to validate a QGIS project or style file against the called *.dtd (http://mrcc.com/qgis.dtd). Two reasons: the URL doesn't exist and using a *.dtd from SVN always returns a "non valid". Having the possibility to validate could decrease erroneous project files. As such it's a feature wish, but as long as QGIS mentions a *.dtd not working, it's a bug.


Related issues

related to QGIS Application - Feature request #2576: reference to dtd wrong Open 02/22/2016
duplicated by QGIS Application - Bug report #6423: Link to DTD document is broken Closed 09/27/2012

History

Updated by Giovanni Manghi over 4 years ago

  • Target version set to Version 1.7.4

Updated by Paolo Cavallini over 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Version 1.7.4 to Version 1.8.0
  • Affected version set to master
  • Causes crash or corruption set to No

Updated by Paolo Cavallini almost 4 years ago

  • Target version changed from Version 1.8.0 to Version 2.0.0

Updated by J├╝rgen Fischer about 2 years ago

  • Target version changed from Version 2.0.0 to Future Release - Lower Priority

Updated by Anita Graser 9 months ago

Changing http://mrcc.com/qgis.dtd to https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/qgis.dtd would at least fix the broken link.
The issue of updating and maintaining the .dtd remains though ...

Updated by Richard Duivenvoorde 9 months ago

According to this text:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_type_definition

this dtd declaration with an url is actually optional, so another option would be to remove it from the xml?

Updated by Luigi Pirelli 5 months ago

we should decide to remove or update... actually the old broken link is used.

Also available in: Atom