Bug #5844
When adding a gpx the dialog shows "Nb of features" all set to "-1"
| Status: | Closed | Start Date: | 06/21/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assigned to: | - | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | Data Provider | |||
| Target version: | Version 2.0.0 | |||
| Platform: | Patch supplied: | No | ||
| Platform version: | Affected version: | master | ||
| Status info: | Causes crash or corruption: | No | ||
| Resolution: | wontfix |
Description
It used to show the right number of features, I'm almost sure it is a regression (I'm testing on master). I will give a try to 1.8 and 1.7.4
Related issues
| related to QGIS Desktop - Bug #5322: ODBC connection window queries all database content | Closed | 04/05/2012 |
History
Updated by Alexander Bruy 12 months ago
This caused by fix for #5322 (ODBC and GPX both uses OGR provider)
Updated by Alexander Bruy 12 months ago
Starting from b6ad69d12c the "unknown" showed instead of "-1". I know this is not real fix, but at least this less confusing
Updated by Giovanni Manghi 6 months ago
- Priority changed from High to Blocker
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
Updated by Jürgen Fischer 6 months ago
- Priority changed from Blocker to Normal
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
I don't agree it's a regression. IMHO it's an improvement and not a bug (see #5322). The output isn't required and therefore should be a blocker.
Updated by Giovanni Manghi 5 months ago
Jürgen Fischer wrote:
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
tagging as blocker as it is a regression.
I don't agree it's a regression. IMHO it's an improvement and not a bug (see #5322). The output isn't required and therefore should be a blocker.
From a user point of view is certainly a regression, because something that says "-1" is not as informative as something (as before) that says (ex.) "35".
But if you say that is not a regression, that as I said is not true, then we should a) close this ticket or b) at least remove that column that says 'feature count "-1"'.
Updated by Jürgen Fischer 5 months ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Resolution set to fixed
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
But if you say that is not a regression, that as I said is not true, then we should a) close this ticket or b) at least remove that column that says 'feature count "-1"'.
Alex already made it say "Unknown" instead of "-1".
Updated by Giovanni Manghi 5 months ago
- Resolution changed from fixed to wontfix
Alex already made it say "Unknown" instead of "-1".
it doesn't change the meaning of what I said, from a user point of view is a regression.